|Category||Farming Simulator 2011|
|The Saracaen (saracaen)||01.08.2011 21:38|
|I have created a mod that appends some new functions to the Steerable class, but it interferes with some of the functions of the ESLimiter specialization.
Is there a way to identify that the ESLimiter specialization is present in the current steerable, so that I can disable my interfering function?
|Stefan Geiger - GIANTS Software||02.08.2011 09:04|
|Yes, you can check this with the following code:
if g_modIsLoaded["ESLimiter"] then
-- the mod with the .zip name "EsLimiter" is loaded.
|The Saracaen (saracaen)||02.08.2011 18:58|
|Thanks for the quick reply, although that is not exactly what I meant.
I have created a script that injects a piece of code in every object containing the Steerable specialization. That script interferes with some other specializations and I want to be able to check if these specializations are present in the current steerable.
Is there a way to identify if , for example, the ESLimiter specialization is present on the current Steerable?
|The Saracaen (saracaen)||03.08.2011 20:37|
|On, for example, the Fendt 380 GTA, the ESLimiter specialization is prepended with the mod namespace. So it would be Fendt380GTATurbo.ESLimiter.
Is there a way to prepend this "namespace" to the SpecializationUtil.hasSpecialization function call?
|The Saracaen (saracaen)||04.08.2011 21:34|
|I have found a solution:
"local check1 = Utils.getNoNil(getXMLBool(xmlFile, "vehicle.features#vario"), true);
self.isVarioEnabled = check1;
if self.customEnvironment ~= nil then
local specialization1 = loadstring(string.format("return %s.ESLimiter", self.customEnvironment))();
local specialization2 = loadstring(string.format("return %s.rpmlimiter", self.customEnvironment))();
local check2 = SpecializationUtil.hasSpecialization(specialization1, self.specializations);
local check3 = SpecializationUtil.hasSpecialization(specialization2, self.specializations);
self.isVarioEnabled = check1 and not check2 and not check3;
Due to the use of loadstring, it might not be optimal. If anyone has a better solution, please let me know.
Note: Log in to post. Create a new account here.